Saturday, February 21, 2009
Blog Book Tour
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Engaging the Eye Generation: Visual Literacy Strategies for the K-5 Classroom by Johanna Riddle
Browse all of Engaging the Eye Generation online!
The way that students are learning today is an ever-evolving process. Johanna opens with an introductory question asking “How do we change the way we teach to best reach today’s learners?” (p. 1). Engaging the Eye Generation answers that question and more. To genuinely reach students with meaningful, authentic learning experiences, educators must prepare them to “navigate life in the twenty-first century” which in turn means we “can’t keep looking at teaching through twentieth-century lenses” (p. 1).
The introductory section is particularly interesting as it lists eight fundamental categories of literacy found in today’s information-based society identified by the North Central Regional Education Laboratory from work already established by the International ICT Literacy Panel.
- Basic Literacy
- Scientific Literacy
- Economic Literacy
- Technological Literacy
- Visual Literacy
- Information Literacy
- Multicultural Literacy
- Global Awareness
“Rather than merely “new”, today’s literacy is multidimensional, incorporating many different ways of receiving and expressing information and often involving creative collaboration. Visual literacy is central to such communication” (p. 4). Johanna starts at the beginning by setting the stage to introducing 21st century literacies and visual skills by comparing them to the beginning stages of reading in young children. The process is a slow sequential one that gradually becomes learned and more complex taking students beyond traditional literacy boundaries.
Chapter 3 begins by saying
“When we embrace the notion that how we teach is as relevant to the learning process as what teach, we naturally begin to expand our instruction to address a wider range of learning styles and literacies. We continue to work within traditional disciplines, but our approach to teaching those disciplines broadens. The inclusion of art, technology, and imagery adds power to traditional tools such as books, paper and pencils. Our students become actively engaged in visual, auditory and kinesthetic interpretation and production of information. As we reach into their world, we transform the everyday business of teaching and learning into a shared, creative journey” (p. 55).
With the advent of all of the new literacies weaving their way into educational instructional environments, developing these literacies is important because it nurtures active engagement through a shared educational journey.
Johanna carefully details her experiences with visual literacies. I think this will remind educators that developing visual literacy skills not only differentiates learning but recognizes that there are a number of ‘multiple intelligences’ that need creative inspiration in the learning environment.
A blog book tour will be taking place here, more details to come. If you have questions you would like to ask Johanna, please post them in the comment section of this post.
Happy reading!
Monday, February 9, 2009
Visitor Map Widget
Thursday, February 5, 2009
The Architecture of Web 2.0
I revisited an article written in 2006 titled ‘Web 2.0 The new internet “boom” doesn’t live up to its name’ by Paul Boutin. Interesting that only a few years ago ‘Web 2.0’ was considered a buzzword by some, while others were wondering what exactly Web 2.0 meant. Tim O’Reilly (who is credited with creating the term Web 2.0) wrote a ‘compact’ definition describing Web 2.0 as:
“Web 2.0 is the network as platform, spanning all connected devices; Web 2.0 applications are those that make the most of the intrinsic advantages of that platform: delivering software as a continually-updated service that gets better the more people use it, consuming and remixing data from multiple sources, including individual users, while providing their own data and services in a form that allows remixing by others, creating network effects through an "architecture of participation," and going beyond the page metaphor of Web 1.0 to deliver rich user experiences.”
Software, if continually updated, gets better as more people use it. The more people that create and use accounts with such tools as Delicious or Twitter, the more it makes the network of sharing and collaboration that much more powerful and meaningful. The “architecture of participation” describes the natural foundation in which Web 2.0 is built. Thinking, linking, connecting, interacting, sharing, collaborating (the list of descriptive words is exhaustive). Web 2.0 lives up to its name, and more.
O’Reilly, T. (2005) Web 2.0: Compact definition? Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/10/web-20-compact-definition.html